you're reading...

You’ll have had your legislative consent. Holyrood will not get a vote on Great Repeal Bill.

The UK government is making clear that it believes the Scottish parliament has no say over the Brexit process because it is about foreign affairs and the constitution, both of which are reserved powers to Westminster.  That will never fly.

Repealing the 1972 European Communities Act will directly affect Holyrood’s powers, not just because Brussels law will no longer apply here.  There is a whole raft of questions about what powers would or should be repatriated to Holyrood,like agriculture and fishers.  There are important questions about whether Scottish workers still have protections at work that were enshrined in EU law.

So, most commentators have assumed that Holyrood should have to be given a say on all this.  Since 1999, under what used to be called the Sewel Convention, Holyrood has had the right to vote on acts of the Westminster Parliament that have an impact on devolved powers. MSPs have to give “legislative consent”. An example was the 2010 Equality Act.

The 2016 Scotland Act, acting on Lord Smith’s recommendation, placed the Sewel Convention on a “statutory basis”, meaning – most people thought – that this was no longer just a political convention but a legal requirement. Nicola Sturgeon believed, not unreasonably, that this meant the Great Repeal Bill (GRB) that radically alters Holyrood’s powers would require the consent of the Scottish Parliament.

At the weekend, the Scottish Brexit Minister, Mike Russell, said that he expected the Scottish Parliament to withhold legislative consent to a “hard Brexit” which excluded the UK from the single market. But the UK Government doesn’t see it this way at all. It’s clear that even if it is accepted that Brexit will affect Holyrood’s powers, MSPs will still not be given any say.

Legal eagles are advising that the 2016 Scotland Act merely stated that the law now recognised the convention, and nothing more. It didn’t actually alter the status quo. In fact, it was meaningless gobbledegook and there is no legal requirement for Holyrood to consent to the GRB. And even if it did, the 2016 Scotland Act only referred to instances where the UK Parliament cut across Holyrood’s existing powers; it didn’t refer to changes in the scope of the Scottish Parliament’s overall powers.

So, according to Professor Mark Elliot, the Cambridge University constitutional law expert, Theresa May needn’t worry her head about legislative consent motions from Holyrood or Cardiff. Scottish MSPs may think they have a say, but they don’t. And anyway, since the Prime Minister is going to push through Article 50 using the pre-democratic powers of Royal Prerogative, she can by-pass parliamentary authority altogether, both in Holyrood and Westminster.
This may all make sense to constitutional lawyers but I suspect your ordinary Scottish voter will see it as the machinations of a parcel o’ rogues. All that post-vow talk from such as Gordon Brown about Britain becoming a kind of federation in which the Scottish Parliament would be entrenched has turned out to be so much hot air; just a clever form of words. You’ll have had your legislative consent.

Brexit will reassert UK sovereignty in the most dramatic way by stripping the Scottish people of the protections of EU law they have enjoyed for 43 years.  The Scottish Parliament will be put firmly in its place. In theory all of the EU laws will remain on the statute book but they will all be provisional and subject to review and, while Holyrood may be “consulted”, it will be a one-way dialogue.

Indeed, the Great Repeal Bill itself is a piece of constitutional theatre, a mere reaffirmation of the EU referendum vote, an offer MPs can’t refuse. The real nuts and bolts of Brexit – the single market and all of that – will be driven through using the Prime Minister’s executive authority. The GRB will not actually come into effect until Brexit is a done deal in 2019.

Mrs May has made clear that MPs and MSPs will have no say on Article 50, no say on the single market and no say over migration and free movement.

At best, Westminster will be invited to endorse a deal that has already been negotiated by the Brexit wrecking crew of David Davis, Boris Johnson and Liam Fox. The Scottish Parliament won’t even get a sniff of that.

This may all seem hunky dory from the vantage point of Oxbridge colleges and Whitehall powerpoint presentations but it is going to lead to discontent in Scotland.

It will revive all the suspicions of Perfidious Albion: that the UK remains essentially an imperial power and cannot be trusted. The Scotland Act, already tarnished, will go down in Nationalist folklore as just another attempt to bamboozle the natives.



About iain2macwhirter

Writer and journalist.


Comments are closed.

Twitter Updates

  • RT @johnpilger: In this address to mark Julian Assange's six years of confinement in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, John Pilger calls on… 8 hours ago

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 52,053 other followers

Follow Iain Macwhirter on WordPress.com



%d bloggers like this: