you're reading...

“The People Versus Tech” by Jamie Bartlett. Review.

Jamie Bartlett is a former digital evangelist who proselytised all things web for the left-leaning think-tank Demos since the early noughties.  We all drank the digital Kool Aid and thought that this new technology would hand power to the people and improve the quality of public debate.  That was until the Arab Spring started to sow doubts, then came Fake News, Russian Trolls and Cambridge Analytica.

“Over the years”, says Bartlett in the People Verus Tech” my optimism drifted into realism, then morphed into nervousness. Now it is approaching mild panic”. He realised that the technology he believed would promote an informed, interactive democracy is doing the reverse: undermining democracy by creating what he calls digital “tribalism”. This is most apparent in the righteous Twitter mobs who roam the internet looking for reasons to be offended, and people to scold. Rational debate is being replaces by what Bartlett calls “a strange performative politics”, in which virtue-signalling to the tribe supplants fact or argument.

Simultaneously, having lost control of our data, we are putting immense power in the hands of a digital elite. The titans of tech, like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, are themselves only dimly aware of how their algorithms actually work at a societal level. Regulation must come, since these “platforms” are now the biggest publishers in the world, yet accept no responsibility for what they publish, be it fake news, sadistic Peppa Pig videos, racist hate speak or rampant conspiracy theories. However, if we hand this technology of surveillance and control to the state, how might government misuse it?

Panic indeed. Understanding how our politics and our behaviour is being monitored and influenced by new digital technologies like psycho-graphics, is doubly alarming because it is so difficult to understand. But Bartlett has the gift of clarity and isn’t afraid to speak his mind. “That a small clique of private companies”, he says of Facebook, Twitter, Google, “ have so much power of the structure and content of public debate, what information we receive and how we communicate, seems to me to be completely and utterly insane”.

That is the essence of the Cambridge Analytica story. Yes, the scraping of data and the targeting of ads may not be as effective in delivering votes as the people selling this tech to political parties claim it is. But the sheer concentration of this data is sinister. It is the cross-referencing of millions of Facebook profiles with the huge commercial databases compiled by insurance companies, credit rating agencies, even government departments, – and yes newspapers, because as Bartlett points out, “we’re all at it”. Labour and Hillary Clinton used data mining just as much as Trump and Vote Leave. Bartlett doesn’t lazily assume that it’s only Brexiteers who’ve gone over to the dark side.

Big Data gives big power because it offers those in possession of it a privileged insight into our very souls. Individual citizens are becoming an assemblage of data points which, when crunched by data scientists, reveal the most personal aspects of our nature: what we believe, our hopes and fears, our political choices, our religious inclinations, even our propensity to commit crime. Predictive policing is only a click away.

More worrying still, we are just at the beginning of this process. Once Artificial Intelligence starts acting on big data then we face the very real possibility that our lives may come to be governed by agencies, outwith our control, which know so much about us that they can predict our very behaviour and thus seek influence it without our knowing.

This isn’t just Russian trolls dicking about in the US presidential elections with fake news designed to polarise opinion. Bartlett foresees a libertarian dystopia dominated by a handful of AI-rich billionaires who have largely supplanted democratic governance itself. “Democracy” he says “is analogue rather than digital”: it is slow, deliberative, rational. There’s no guarantee it can survive in the digital cauldron of emotion and mob politics. The portents from the countries at the leading edge of tech are not good. 

In China, where every single citizen will soon be tracked by facial recognition software using 570 million cameras, the Communist government is currently developing a system called Social Credit. Each of its 1.3bn citizens will get a rating based on every known aspect of their life: financial status, social engagement, criminal activity, professional achievement, consumption patterns and of course political correctness. Everyone will have a number over their head which the government says will create a “glorious trust society”. It’s also a living hell.

The choice is between the Scylla of rampant inequality and social disintegration under job-killing turbo-capitalism, or the Charybdis of a digitally-powered techno-authoritarianism. Our only hope of avoiding these futures, and releasing the potential of digital technology to increase society’s wealth and knowledge, is to insist on democratic oversight and full transparency, especially of the algorithms that increasingly run our lives.

At an individual level, Bartlett urges us to adopt what he calls a “principle of charity” –  just stop demonising people on social media who disagree with you. That sounds like 2000-year-old Christian morality as a salve for the “toxic disinhibition” of the web. Tech people will say he’s naive.  But we need somehow to humanise behaviour on the web, and that applies as much to the excesses of #metoo as to Twitter trolls.  The mob shaming, the broadcasting of gossip, the  reckless accusations levelled at people who have no opportunity to defend themselves.  The war against so called “Terfs” by a tiny group of transgender activists on the web has led to statements like “the penis is a male sex organ” effectively being censored by Twitter on grounds of hate speak.  How on earth did we get here?

Bartlett does sometimes gets carried away with his own rhetoric, but I can’t think of a more important book right now. Shame those woefully ill-informed US Congressmen didn’t get a copy before they interrogated Mark Zuckerberg.

“The People Vs Tech – how the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it), by Jamie Bartlett.  Penguin.

A version of this review appeared in the Herald.

About @iainmacwhirter

I'm a columnist for the Herald. Author of "Road to Referendum" and "Disunited Kingdom". Was a BBC TV and radio presenter for 25 years - "Westminster Live" and "Holyrood Live" mainly. Spent time as columnist for The Observer, Guardian, New Statesman. Former Rector of Edinburgh University. Live in Edinburgh and spend a lot of time in the French Pyrenees. Will that do?


Comments are closed.

Twitter Updates

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 57,082 other followers

Follow Iain Macwhirter on WordPress.com



%d bloggers like this: